Legal Opinion · Dissent

Certification From the U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Wash. in Mariano Carranza v. Dovex Fruit Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2018No. 94229-3Published

1Dissent

STEPHENS, J. (dissenting)

¶ 35 Washington's Minimum Wage Act (MWA), ch. 49.46 RCW, was never intended to restrict the type of compensation system an employer may use, whether it be an hourly, salary, commission, or piece-rate system. Rather, the statute's mandate is clear: every employer must pay each employee a minimum wage rate of pay for every hour worked. Ignoring the statutory term "rate," the majority creates a "per hour" right to separate compensation under the MWA for the time agricultural pieceworkers spend performing tasks outside of piece-rate picking work. This holding disregards…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API