State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Smith
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BOHLING, Commissioner.
The relator (respondent here) presents the issue that this appeal by defendants (appellants here) should be dismissed, because there is no final judgment in the case upon which to base an appeal. The issue is for consideration whether raised or not. Deeds v. Foster, Mo., 235 S.W.2d 262 [1], Relator’s point is well taken. We have jurisdiction by reason of the amount in dispute.
On June 23, 1955, the State of Missouri at the relation of the State Highway Commission instituted condemnation proceedings in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, seeking, among other…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Deeds v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Weir Ex Rel. Weir v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Wicker v. Knox Glass Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HammelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Columbia Mutual Insurance Co. v. EpsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Shell v. ShellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Armacost Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.