Legal Opinion

E v. E

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1973No. 46PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal.

1. Was the question of the child’s paternity res ju-dicata because the defendant failed to challenge it at the original divorce proceeding; and

2. Assuming the question of paternity was not res judicata, should the defendant be estopped from denying that he is the natural father of the child ?

This court is faced with the unique situation of a person initially claiming in court and under oath that a child is his, and then some eight months later challenging this child’s legitimacy when he decides that it is no longer to his advantage to pay the child’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. SorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Adoption of StroopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Baum v. BaumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Johns v. JohnsWashington Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Withrow v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Nancy Darlene M. v. James Lee M., Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Miller v. Miller (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  4. Marriage/Children of Betty L.W. v. William E.W.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Riemer v. RiemerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API