Legal Opinion

Stoll v. First Nat. Bank of Independence

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Simon Stoll, plaintiff, sued First National Bank of Independence, defendant, because of the loss of services and medical expense occasioned by injuries sustained by plaintiff's wife when she fell in defendant's bank building. Judgment was for plaintiff and defendant appeals. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff moves dismissal of the appeal because of the alleged violation of our rule requiring appellant to file "a clear and concise statement of the case without argument, reference to issues of law or repetition of testimony of witness." In this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Adelsberger v. SheehySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Ilgenfritz v. Missouri Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Main v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  5. Paubel v. HitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Goslin v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Hamilton v. Patton Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Stoll v. First National Bank of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Miller v. Multiplex Faucet CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. O'NEILL v. SherrillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API