Legal Opinion

Rice v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1946No. 11425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover the balance alleged to be due the plaintiff (appellee here) as premiums on three compensation-insurance policies. The controversy arose over the proper rate that should have been charged, it being conceded that the rate should have been either $2.70 or $4.36 per hundred dollars of payroll, dependent upon *965the proper classification of the risks by the Board of Insurance Commissioners of Texas.

Standing upon their claim that the rate should have been $2.70 per hundred, defendants below (appellants here) filed a counterclaim for the excessive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. English Freight Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. First Texas State Insurance v. SmalleyTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Ramsey v. Tod, Secretary of StateTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. McCallum v. Associated Retail Credit Men of AustinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Can Company v. Horlamus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Johnson v. Quad Drilling Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. VIP Financial Services, LLC v. Frost BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API