Rice v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
This is an action to recover the balance alleged to be due the plaintiff (appellee here) as premiums on three compensation-insurance policies. The controversy arose over the proper rate that should have been charged, it being conceded that the rate should have been either $2.70 or $4.36 per hundred dollars of payroll, dependent upon *965the proper classification of the risks by the Board of Insurance Commissioners of Texas.
Standing upon their claim that the rate should have been $2.70 per hundred, defendants below (appellants here) filed a counterclaim for the excessive…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- English Freight Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- First Texas State Insurance v. SmalleyTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Ramsey v. Tod, Secretary of StateTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- McCallum v. Associated Retail Credit Men of AustinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Can Company v. Horlamus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Johnson v. Quad Drilling Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- VIP Financial Services, LLC v. Frost BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022