Legal Opinion

Doe v. Replogle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2013No. SD 32538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, J.

John Doe (“Plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in a declaratory action case. Plaintiffs suit requested a determination that he was not required to register as a sex offender and an injunction requiring law enforcement officials to remove his information from the sex offender registry. On appeal, Plaintiff raises two points: (1) requiring him to register as a sex offender violates Article I, Section 13 of the Missouri Constitution because his conviction occurred before Missouri enacted the Sex Offender Registry Act (“SORA”);1 and (2) the federal Sex Offender…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Doe v. KeathleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Roe v. ReplogleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. United States v. FasthorseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. MinorU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MARK J. HORTON v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. in Re Shelby Longoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API