Doe v. Replogle
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, J.
John Doe (“Plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in a declaratory action case. Plaintiffs suit requested a determination that he was not required to register as a sex offender and an injunction requiring law enforcement officials to remove his information from the sex offender registry. On appeal, Plaintiff raises two points: (1) requiring him to register as a sex offender violates Article I, Section 13 of the Missouri Constitution because his conviction occurred before Missouri enacted the Sex Offender Registry Act (“SORA”);1 and (2) the federal Sex Offender…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Doe v. KeathleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Roe v. ReplogleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- United States v. FasthorseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MinorU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MARK J. HORTON v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- in Re Shelby Longoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015