Legal Opinion
See v. Building Commissioner
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 8, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
One of the original petitioners installed two electric passenger elevators in a building in Springfield ownéd by the other original petitioner. The respondent is building commissioner of Springfield. Acting under the power conferred by St. 1913, c. 806, § 1, now G. L. c. 143, § 62, he wrote to the owner of the building a letter calling attention to particulars in which the elevators as installed were not in compliance with requirements of law, as he thought. The petitioners under the provisions of St. 1913, c. 806, § 11, now G. L. c. 143, § 70, appealed to the Superior Court. In the Superior…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. WeitzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Holmes v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Palmer v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Commonwealth v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.