Legal Opinion

United States v. Barnwell

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 18, 2008No. 2:03-cr-80074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS ON DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND SPEEDY TRIAL ACT GROUNDS

GERALD E. ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This criminal matter was reassigned to this Court following Chief Judge Friedman’s sua sponte recusal of himself after the case was remanded to this Court for a new trial pursuant to the Sixth Circuit’s September 7, 2007 Mandate. The case is presently before the Court on two motions filed by Defendant Barnwell on January 25, 2008: a “Motion to Dismiss Indictment Pursuant to the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment” and a “Motion to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. Ross County Court of Common PleasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  2. Kitchen v. Ross County Court of Common PleasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. Schafer v. Multiband Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API