Estate of Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
In general terms the issue presented is whether a power to invade corpus given the testamentary trustee in this case amounted to a general power of appointment or whether it was sufficiently circumscribed by ascertainable standards so as to be removed from that uncomfortable category.
The trial court found “that the language of the trust did set forth an ascertainable standard for determining ‘reasonable care, comfort, support and maintenance’ by using the guideline of ‘the standard of living as of date of decedent’s death.’ This is a limitation on the power of the trustee…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Penny v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Estate of Little v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Estate of Little v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986