Legal Opinion
Penny v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 2004No. B161317PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, Acting P. J.
Appellants Melinda Penny (Melinda), John Ferris (John), and Richard Ferris (Richard) appeal from a judgment entered after a court trial in favor of respondent Kristin Elaine Wilson (Kristin). Appellants contend that the trial court erred in finding the 1998 creation of a tmst and conveyance of real property to the tmst by decedent William Ferris (William) to be valid. We agree, and reverse the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 4, 1981, William and Elaine Ferris (Elaine) created the Ferris Family Tmst (FFT). The following six real properties were put…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Coberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- McA Inc. And Universal City Studios, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Guardianship of LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Trolan v. Trolan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Thorstrom v. ThorstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ammerman v. CallenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- AmeriGas Propane, LP v. Landstar Ranger, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.