Legal Opinion

Smith v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 5667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the District Court of Pueblo County. Hon. John H. Voorhees, Judge. A. H. Smith was convicted of conspiracy, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The plaintiff in error and one Charles E. Thomas were indicted by a grand jury called by the district court of Pueblo county on the 14th of January, 1905, for entering into a conspiracy to cause certain parties who were not entitled to vote to be registered in precinct No. 56 in Pueblo county. Plaintiff in error was tried alone and convicted. The court permitted the people, over the objection of plaintiff in error, to introduce evidence as to the acts and declarations of defendant Thomas done and made long after the purpose of the alleged conspiracy was consummated, and not in the presence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Calderwood v. PeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. People v. AleckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Willis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Cutler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Mulligan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. People v. PeerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Burford v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API