Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Town of Moretown

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 31, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

General and Special Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury, at the March term, 1898, Washington county, Munson, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The defendant was summoned before the city court of the city of Barre,- in an action of general and special assumpsit, “to answer to John H. Kelley of Moretown, R. W. Kelley, plaintiff in interest of town of Barre, in the county of Washington.” The special count in the declaraction is based upon a contract alleged to have been made by the defendant with the plaintiffs for the use and occupation of a certain dwelling-house owned by the plaintiffs. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs in the city court and the defendant appealed therefrom to the county court. On trial of the case in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vail v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  2. Collamer v. PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  3. Danforth v. StreeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  4. Mann v. BirchardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
  5. Hall v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. Deerfield Lumber Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  3. State v. HirschSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API