Legal Opinion

Deerfield Lumber Co. v. Lyman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 28, 1915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal in Chancery, Windham County. Heard at Chambers, August 20, 1913, on the pleadings and findings of fact by the chancellor, Fish, Chancellor. Decree for the orators. The defendant appealed. The bill has a prayer for general relief. The deed of the New England Hardwood Company is from the Deerfield Lumber Company. The cutting complained of was done by defendant in August, 1912. The opinion sufficiently states the other facts in the ease.

Read the full summary

Appeal in Chancery, Windham County. Heard at Chambers, August 20, 1913, on the pleadings and findings of fact by the chancellor, Fish, Chancellor. Decree for the orators. The defendant appealed. The bill has a prayer for general relief. The deed of the New England Hardwood Company is from the Deerfield Lumber Company. The cutting complained of was done by defendant in August, 1912. The opinion sufficiently states the other facts in the ease. Defendant by abandoning the premises for so many years after he first cut and removed all the accessible timber lost his right to reenter and cut the…

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This suit grows out of a controversy over certain timber on a tract of land in Dover known as the “Wait” lot. The Deerfield Lumber Co. owns the land and The New England Hardwood Co. claims title to certain of the timber growing thereon. The bill charges that the defendant, without right or title in the premises, had entered upon the land and had cut and removed therefrom a large quantity of hard and soft wood timber, the property of the orators, and purposes to cut and remove all the hard and soft -wood timber standing upon the premises. It is further alleged that the timber was small and not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hicks v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Fletcher v. LyonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Fairbanks v. StoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Toledo, St. Louis & New Orleans R. R. v. St. Louis & Ohio River RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cushman v. OutwaterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Hall v. Village of SwantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  3. University of Vermont & State Agricultural College v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Cummer Co. v. YagerSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  5. Holton v. HassamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API