Legal Opinion

Becton v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The parties will be designated as follows, the petitioner, Robert Earl Becton, as defendant, and the respondent, State of Tennessee, as the State.

Defendant was convicted on a guilty plea in the Shelby County Criminal Court on May 1, 1971, of involuntary manslaughter, and was sentenced to not less than one nor more than five years in the penitentiary, with the actual place of confinement to be the Shelby County Penal Farm, by order of the trial court.

On November 23, 1971, after serving about six months of the sentence, defendant filed a petition for suspended sentence.

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Bolin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Daugherty v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CorrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ArcherCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  3. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  4. Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API