State v. Correll
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
The only issue on this direct appeal in a criminal case is whether excluding convictions for selling schedule I or II controlled substances from eligibility for suspended sentences violates the equal protection clauses of the State or Federal Constitutions.
Appellant received a sentence of not less than four years nor more than seven years for selling cocaine in violation of T.C.A. § 52-1432(a)(l)(B). The trial judge denied defendant’s petition for probation for the reason that the statute authorizing the suspension of sentences, T.C.A. § 40-2901, excludes from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Harrison v. SchraderTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Hooper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Swain v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. ErwingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- State v. TesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BernadesHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BunchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- State v. Christopher LindsayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.