Legal Opinion

State v. Correll

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The only issue on this direct appeal in a criminal case is whether excluding convictions for selling schedule I or II controlled substances from eligibility for suspended sentences violates the equal protection clauses of the State or Federal Constitutions.

Appellant received a sentence of not less than four years nor more than seven years for selling cocaine in violation of T.C.A. § 52-1432(a)(l)(B). The trial judge denied defendant’s petition for probation for the reason that the statute authorizing the suspension of sentences, T.C.A. § 40-2901, excludes from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Harrison v. SchraderTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hooper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Swain v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. ErwingDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Syed Hassan v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. State v. TesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BernadesHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BunchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. State v. Christopher LindsayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API