Legal Opinion

Neal v. Vansickle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1904No. 13,592PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to the district court for Nemaha county: John S. Stull, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

In 1903 the legislature passed an act, chapter 116 of the laws, sections 1-19, article IV, chapter 89 of the Compiled Statutes (Annotated Statutes, 5561-5579), the purpose of which is expressed in its title as follows:

“An act to provide for the formation of drainage districts ; for the reclamation and protection of swamp, overflowed, or submerged lands; to provide for the acquirement of rights of way, easements and franchises, or other property necessary to carry out the purposes of this act; to prescribe the course of procedure to lie followed to accomplish such object; and to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Thomas v. GainMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Hanscom v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Smith v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Harris v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dwyer v. Omaha-Douglas Public Building CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. County of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bannerman v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API