Paterson v. University of State of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFbank A. GKjlotta, J.
This is a motion by defendants pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint as insufficient in law.
The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment to the effect that article 148 of the Education Law (added by L. I960, ch. 1082) is unconstitutional.
The questioned enactment attempts to create a new profession to be called 1 ‘ Landscape Architecture ’ ’ and contains 13 sections which set up a comprehensive plan for defining the activity, licensing its practitioners, and invoking criminal penalties against those who after July 1, 1961, engage in the proscribed conduct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People v. KucNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Seignious v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People v. EstreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paterson v. University of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Paterson v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- People v. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Paterson v. University of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1964