Legal Opinion
Matter of Seignious v. Rice
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1936PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
In 1930, after examination by the Examining Board of Plumbers of the City of New York, and the receipt of a certificate of competency from the Board, the petitioner, Robert Seignious, was licensed as a master plumber and, in accordance with the provisions of the Greater New York Charter (Laws of 1901, ch. 466), he has registered his name annually as a licensed master plumber and thus renewed his license without taking a new examination. The Legislature, by chapter 610 of the Laws of 1936, repealed title 5 of. chapter 23 (erroneously numbered “ 21 ” in the statute) of the Greater New York…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People v. C. Klinck Packing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wasmuth v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Rowell v. State Board of AgricultureUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Noyes v. Erie & Wyoming Farmers Co-Operative Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn HarborNew York Supreme Court · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.