Legal Opinion

Docken v. Myrick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 16, 2017No. CV130707; A157854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShore, J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. In that petition, petitioner alleges that his trial counsel was inadequate when he made a number of errors during the investigation leading up to the criminal trial underlying this case. On appeal, petitioner asserts eight assignments of error; however, we write only to address petitioner’s first two assignments, the resolution of which makes consideration of his remaining six assignments unnecessary.

In petitioner’s first assignment of error, he argues that the post-conviction court wrongly overruled his hearsay…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Mitchell v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Rudnitskyy v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API