Legal Opinion

Rudnitskyy v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 2020No. A165073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

549 Argued and submitted October 30, 2018, affirmed April 15, 2020 PETR VASILYEVICH RUDNITSKYY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit Court 16CV15467; A165073

464 P3d 471

Petitioner was convicted of unlawful possession of heroin following a jury trial and now appeals a judgment denying him post-conviction relief. Petitioner argues that he received constitutionally inadequate and ineffective assistance of counsel during his trial. Specifically, petitioner argues that trial counsel’s perfor- mance was deficient when counsel first volunteered, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pereida-Alba v. CourseyOregon Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Torres v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Allen v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. Allen v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API