Legal Opinion
Falk v. State Bar of Michigan
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 10, 1986No. G 84-1405 CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff is Allan Falk, a licensed Michigan attorney. Defendant is the State Bar of Michigan. Plaintiff brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 for deprivation of his rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that the State Bar of Michigan uses mandatory bar dues received pursuant to Michigan law in violation of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Levine v. Supreme Court of WisconsinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
- Kale v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Syncora Guarantee Inc. v. J.P. Morgan SecuritiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kaufman v. SeidmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
- Quick v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.