Legal Opinion

Schichman v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The policy provided that the insurer would be liable only for losses which occurred within ninety days of an accident. The proof was that the insured suffered the amputation of his right leg but that such amputation occurred one hundred eight days after the happening of the accident. The insurer rejected the claim of the plaintiff upon the ground that the injuries suffered were not the result solely and exclusively of accidental means. • The plaintiff thereupon started an action and the insurer, in its answer, denied the allegation that the injury had resulted solely and exclusively from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Draper v. Oswego County Fire Relief Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. S. & E. Motor Hire Corp. v. New York Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. National Discount Shoes, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Guberman v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Callahan v. American Motorists InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bleckner v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API