Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Comstock Insurance v. Thomas A. Hanson & Associates, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 1988No. 480, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

There are three parties in interest to this dispute over an exclusion clause in an insurance contract. Carl and Edward Julio, together, are developers; Thomas A. Hanson & Associates, Inc. is an engineering firm that provided certain architectural and engineering services to the Julios; Com-stock Insurance Company is an insurance company that issued a professional liability insurance policy to Hanson.

The Julios recovered a $287,500 judgment against Hanson for breach of contract and professional negligence. They and Hanson are seeking to have Comstock pay that judgment, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Mattis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company v. Van BuskirkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. McGlawnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Louis Marsch, Inc. v. Pekin Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. McMahan & Baker, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Artra Group, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API