King v. King

SMITH, Judge.

This appeal arises from an order filed 30 March 1998 denying defendant’s motion for modification of child support, motion for modification of custody, motion to hold plaintiff in contempt, and motion for attorney fees, but granting plaintiffs motion to hold defendant in contempt; and from an order entered 7 June 1999, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial (on these same issues) and denying amendment of the 30 March 1998 order.

Defendant’s main contention is that she was denied due process of law because she was not advised of her right to have counsel appointed to represent…