Wake County, Ex Rel. Carrington v. Townes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The dispositive issue, which is also one of first impression in our Court, is whether constitutional due process guarantees the provision of appointed legal counsel to an indigent defendant in a civil paternity suit instituted by a county on behalf of its department of social services’ child support enforcement agency. We conclude that indigent defendants do not have an absolute constitutional right to appointed counsel in this legal setting and that due process affords only a qualified entitlement to appointed counsel as determined by the trial court on a case-by-case…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Leonard v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Corra v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Mead v. BatchlorMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Settle by and Through Sullivan v. BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.