Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Puritan-Bennett Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1982No. Civ. A. 79-4582PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

This products liability action was commenced in state court by Daniel Sherman (“Sherman”), administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, Margaret. Defendant Puritan-Bennett Corporation timely removed the case to this court and subsequently impleaded third-party defendants Delaware County Memorial Hospital (“Hospital”) and Bard-Parker, a division of Becton Dickson and Company (“Bard”). Jurisdiction exists by reason of the diverse citizenship of Sherman and Puritan. 1 Pennsylvania law is applicable. Bard has moved for summary judgment on Puritan’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Patricia A. Hollinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Germaine S. Hollinger, Deceased v. Wagner Mining Equipment Company, a Division of Paccar, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Pullman Trailmobile, Division of M.W. Kellogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Shaffer v. Pullman Trailmobile, Division of M.W. Kellogg Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API