Legal Opinion

Marilyn Carano v. Vina Concha Y Toro S.A.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Decided June 5, 2003No. 91125728Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE THIS OPINION IS CITABLE Trademark Trial and Appeal Board AS PRECEDENT OF 2900 Crystal Drive THE T.T.A.B. Arlington, Virginia 22202-3513 EAD June 5, 2003 Opposition No. 125,728 Marilyn Carano a/k/a Lynn Carano d/b/a Lynn Carano Graphics v. Vina Concha Y Toro S.A. Before Cissel, Seeherman, and Rogers, Administrative Trademark Judges. By the Board: This case comes up on applicant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The motion has been fully briefed.1 1 In its reply brief,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. John v. Young v. Agb CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Selva & Sons, Inc. v. Nina Footwear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Best Lock Corporation v. Schlage Lock CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API