Legal Opinion
United States v. Francisco Bonilla-Montenegro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2003No. 02-50141PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Francisco Bonilla-Montenegro (“Bonilla”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for attempted reentry after deportation and false claim to United States citizenship in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and 18 U.S.C. § 911, respectively. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294(1). Because Bonilla’s sentence is error-free, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A jury convicted Bonilla of attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and false claim to United States citizenship, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. The district…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Miguel Trinidad-AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Officemax, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Javier Velasquez-Reyes, A.K.A. Javier Alvarado-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jorge Rodriguez-Rodriguez, United States of America v. Jorge Rodriguez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Vargas-DuranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Dennis BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.