Legal Opinion

Moreno v. Russell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1936No. Civil No. 3619PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an action filed by J. E. Russell, hereinafter called plaintiff, against National Exploration Corporation, a corporation, hereinafter called the Exploration Company, and National Gold Corporation, a corporation, hereinafter called the Gold Company. The Gold Company went into bankruptcy while this suit was pending, and J. F. Moreno, the trustee in bankruptcy, was substituted as party defendant.

There are four counts in the complaint, but as only one of them is discussed in the briefs we shall consider only that one. It alleges, in substance, that plaintiff is an attorney at law, and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Catts v. PhalenSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Rain v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Strickland v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The City of Phoenix v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Adelman v. ChristyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
  3. Julian v. CarpenterArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Silva v. De MundArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hammels v. BrittenArizona Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API