Martin v. Martin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
Appellant and appellee, husband and wife, respectively, separated, after approximately one year of marriage, when appellee moved out of their house. She subsequently brought this action for support, and the court below found her entitled thereto and ordered appellant to make monthly payments. We agree with appellant that appellee was not legally entitled to support, and reverse the order of the lower court.
Our duty on this appeal is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the order of the hearing judge. Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. Rovner, 177 Pa.Super. 122, 111 A.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pinkenson v. PinkensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lipschultz v. LipschultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. RovnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Kurpiewski v. KurpiewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Arbitman v. ArbitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fleming v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fleming v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981