Martin v. Fab-Con, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants Equipment Co., LLC and CCR, LLC move the Court to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).1 Defendants argue that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter *644because the barge upon which plaintiff was working when he was injured is not a “vessel.” As is explained more fully below, the Court treats this motion as a motion for summary judgment because the issue of whether the barge is a vessel is intertwined with the merits of the case. Because the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Nationwide Agribusiness InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.