Legal Opinion

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. Horton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1969No. 683SC367PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrocK, J.

Plaintiffs assign as error the signing and entry of the judgments of nonsuit in the two cases.

Plaintiffs succinctly state their contention to be that the stipulation entered into at the 23 October 1967 Session provides that “the rulings and judgment rendered” in the two cases tried at that session would be binding on the parties in the other three cases only to the extent that those rulings were applicable to the facts of the other three cases. They contend, therefore, that the facts of all the cases must be compared to determine the extent to which the stipulation is binding in the other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. North Missouri Railroad v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Huegel v. HuegelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd., of London v. Chattahoochee Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Jarrett v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Sloop v. FribergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Blair v. FairchildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Moore v. Richard West Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Sloop v. FribergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API