Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no proof in the record of any agreement between plaintiff, as holder of the note, and defendant-appellant, as indorser, that the note was to be surrendered and a second mortgage substituted in its stead. Plaintiff wanted security for the various advances he had made, and the debtor gave him the note which appellant indorsed as evidence of the debt, with the understanding that any proceeds realized from the mortgage the debtor obtained would be applied against her obligations. It had been contemplated that the debtor would obtain such payments through foreclosure proceedings, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harding v. . TifftNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walther v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Commercial Trading Co. v. FreidusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Dominion Financial Corp. v. Haimil Realty Corp. (In re Haimil Realty Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. MTB Bank v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Mint Factors v. CastelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API