Legal Opinion
State v. Company
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 4, 1941No. 3189PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By an order dated June 13, 1940, the Commission prescribed rates based on a valuation of the company's property of $435,000, on a 5 1/2% rate of return, and on estimates of receipts and charges which would yield the return. The company claims a higher valuation, a higher rate of return and a higher estimate of charges. In its appeal it sets forth many specific claims of error in the Commission's findings of facts and rulings of law, as well as of failure to act upon requests for findings and rulings.
At the outset, the discretionary scope of action upon the appeal as authorized by the statute…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Meehan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- In Re the Application of Diamond State Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1955
- In Re the Application of Diamond State Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.