Legal Opinion

Van Zee v. Bayview Hardware Store

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1968No. Civ. 23942PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.

Plaintiff was awarded judgment of $34,000 on a verdict because of injuries to his hand which were caused by the explosion of an aerosol paint can. The action was tried on the theories of strict liability and breach of warranty of fitness. Defendants at trial, against both of which judgment was rendered, were Bayview Hardware Store, which sold the can to plaintiff, and Zynolyte Products Co., Inc., purveyors of paint, which sold the can to Bayview Hardware.

The trial judge made an order granting defendants’ motion for new trial. Prom this order, plaintiff, William Van Zee, appeals. Two grounds…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API