Legal Opinion
Hawthorn v. Davis
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1932No. 924PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.
The defendant, T. E. Davis, in payment of a judgment obtained in compensation for injuries, received $925, which he deposited in the First National Bank of De Bidder.
This sum of money so deposited, and which had not been mixed or mingled with any other fund, was seized by plaintiff, Harry Hawthorn, by way of garnishment in execution of a judgment he had obtained against Davis, defendant.
The defendant avers that he -has no other money, that it is the identical money he received in payment of his judgment in compensation, and that it is exempt from seizure under the laws of this state. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McIntosh v. AubreySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Festervand v. LasterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Fischer v. DubrocaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Allen's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Penn-Florida Hotels Corp. v. Atlantic National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Billingslea v. TartellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sinclair v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Lebleu v. DeshotelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.