Sinclair v. Hodge
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, a debtor in bankruptcy, contends that Louisiana law protects certain amounts of money in his checking account from seizure because this money is attributable to his wages. Although the bankruptcy court agreed with appellant, the district court reached the opposite conclusion and ruled that the funds in appellant’s accounts were not exempt from turnover. We agree with the district court and so affirm.
Toby James Sinclair filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition eight days after his monthly salary was direct-deposited into his checking account. Sinclair, a teacher,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In the Matter of Henry A. Kokoszka, BankruptsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Daugherty v. Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. FitzGerald Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Belsome v. BelsomeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2008