Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Conway
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2007No. 33050PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
Michael T. Hayes appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
*505i.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In April 2004, Hayes was incarcerated under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Department of Corrections. He was given an initial dental exam which established he had a bridge spanning upper teeth numbers 3-12 and the presence of gingival disease and minimal calculus (tartar). At the time, when filling out his medical history, Hayes indicated his chief complaint was bleeding gums and that he had a heart condition, rheumatism, and arthritis. He also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mr. And Mrs. J.L. Rogers, Etc. v. David C. Evans, Leland Q. Linahan, Mr. And Mrs. J.L. Rogers, Etc. v. Vendya LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael T. Hayes v. Kessler & ArmfieldIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
- O-KelIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- Williams v. HollinsheadIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Williams v. HollinsheadIdaho Supreme Court · 2020