ABDUL-AZIZ v. HICKS
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : SHAROB ABDUL-AZIZ, : Civil Action No. 20-10265-SDW-AME : Plaintiffs, : v. : OPINION and ORDER : : MARCUS O. HICKS, et al., : : Defendants. : THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of pro se Plaintiff Sharob Abdul- Aziz (“Plaintiff”) for leave to amend and supplement the complaint pursuant to Rule 15.1 [D.E. 63]. Defendants oppose the motion. [D.E. 67, 68]. The Court has reviewed the motion papers and finds oral argument unnecessary. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.