Legal Opinion

ABDUL-AZIZ v. HICKS

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 22, 2023No. 2:20-cv-10265Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : SHAROB ABDUL-AZIZ, : Civil Action No. 20-10265-SDW-AME : Plaintiffs, : v. : OPINION and ORDER : : MARCUS O. HICKS, et al., : : Defendants. : THIS MATTER is before the Court on the motion of pro se Plaintiff Sharob Abdul- Aziz (“Plaintiff”) for leave to amend and supplement the complaint pursuant to Rule 15.1 [D.E. 63]. Defendants oppose the motion. [D.E. 67, 68]. The Court has reviewed the motion papers and finds oral argument unnecessary. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API