Legal Opinion

Transit Authority of River City v. Montgomery

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1992No. 91-SC-547-DGPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

This appeal involves charges that the trial judge denied Ruth Montgomery a fair trial by reason of prejudicial remarks and conduct which allegedly resulted in a denial of her claims against Transit Authority of River City (TARC) and its driver, Lester E. Midkiff.

Appellee, Montgomery, was a passenger on a TARC bus driven by Lester E. Mid-kiff. This bus was specially equipped to handle three wheelchair passengers, wherein designated seats would “flip up” and allow a wheelchair to be locked in place. Appellee, who was not unduly handicapped, was sitting in one of the special…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evans v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Ideal Pool Corp. v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Collins v. Sparks Ex Rel. SparksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  4. Stamp v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Rankin v. Blue Grass Boys Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Perdue v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CulkinHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API