State v. Murdock
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
{1 Defendant Stony Shay Murdock challenges his forcible sodomy conviction, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-408(1)-(2) (2008), arguing that the trial court abused its discretion under rule 16 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure when it refused to grant a mistrial or to allow him the opportunity to conduct further discovery on the testing status of a second DNA swab (the DNA swab) due to the State's discovery violation, see Utah R.Crim. P. 1 We affirm.
1 2 Although it is questionable whether the prosecutor actually violated the discovery rules, we will assume…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BakalovUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WorkmanUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KallinUtah Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gordon v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MaamaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Gordon v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016