Legal Opinion

Wade v. Berkeley County

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 2000No. 3145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

This case was heard en banc to determine the efficacy of a document entitled “Covenant Not To Execute Judgment” as juxtaposed to the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. In this negligence action, Gerald D. Wade, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Berkeley County pursuant to the Tort Claims Act.1 We reverse and remand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On the morning of June 1, 1995, Bobby Joe Pierce was driving his personal vehicle to his job as an animal control officer with Berkeley County. While on the way, Pierce stopped to determine if a dead dog…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Powers v. TempleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Vermeer Carolina's, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chipper Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wade v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Andrade v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Parker v. Transport Leasing/Contract IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  4. Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Wanda Whetstone v. Office of the GovernorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API