Legal Opinion
Baisden v. West
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided May 18, 1998No. 98-38PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
On January 6, 1998, the Court received from the pro se appellant a Notice of Appeal (NOA) from an August 19, 1997, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision denying as not well grounded his claim for service connection for choroidal melanoma, resulting in enucleation of the right eye, as secondary to exposure to Agent Orange. The appellant had mailed the NOA to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of the General Counsel (O.G.C.) at VA Central Office in Washington, D.C.; the O.G.C. received the NOA on November 19, 1997, but did not deliver it to the Court until…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lyle H. Prenzler v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Skinner v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fenderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Cintron v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- William O. Reed , Jr. v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
- Santoro v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- Pogue v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000