Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick
New York Supreme Court
Action for separation on the ground of cruelty; counterclaim for abandonment.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
A judgment of separation does not affect the integrity of the marriage relation, but merely discharges the com- • plaining spouse from the duty of cohabitation.
It is not the law of Hew York that to such judgment in favor of a wife actual or apprehended physical injury is an indispensable , condition. By the terms of the statute “ cruel and inhuman treat- • ment ” justifies a sentence of separation; and that inhumanity may be evinced and cruelty inflicted by verbal outrage as well as. by *379bodily abuse is a fact of human experience and of judicial recognition. Lutz v. Lutz, 31 N. Y. St. Repr.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Waltermire v. . WaltermireNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Straus v. StrausNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Bergman v. BergmanNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Weaver v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Heylmun v. HeylmunNew York Supreme Court · 1922