Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for separation on the ground of cruelty; counterclaim for abandonment.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

A judgment of separation does not affect the integrity of the marriage relation, but merely discharges the com- • plaining spouse from the duty of cohabitation.

It is not the law of Hew York that to such judgment in favor of a wife actual or apprehended physical injury is an indispensable , condition. By the terms of the statute “ cruel and inhuman treat- • ment ” justifies a sentence of separation; and that inhumanity may be evinced and cruelty inflicted by verbal outrage as well as. by *379bodily abuse is a fact of human experience and of judicial recognition. Lutz v. Lutz, 31 N. Y. St. Repr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Waltermire v. . WaltermireNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Straus v. StrausNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Reynolds v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bergman v. BergmanNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Weaver v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Heylmun v. HeylmunNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API