Legal Opinion
Donovan v. Hackney, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 23, 1984No. Civ. 82-871-RPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
This action was instituted by the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), upon its Petition for Adjudication in Contempt. The petition alleges that the Defendants, Hackney, Inc. and Hackney’s plant manager, Wayne Schwedland, violated an order of this Court in refusing to allow an OSHA inspection after being served with a duly issued search warrant. The Defendants have counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that OSHA’s program for selection of establishments to be inspected…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parisi v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mosher Steel-Virginia, Inc. v. TeigSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hackney, Inc., and Wayne SchwedlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Labor CommissionerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Reich v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- Donovan v. Mosher Steel Company, Division of Trinity IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.