Legal Opinion
Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan Pangilinan, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama Litonjua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1987No. 81-5427Published
1Opinion of the Court
809 F.2d 1449
Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan PANGILINAN, et al.,
Petitioners- Appellants,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama LITONJUA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 80-4543, 81-5427.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1987.
Simmons & Ungar and Donald I. Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., Baxley and Mautino and Robert A. Mautino, San Diego, Cal., for the petitioners-appellants.
Lauri Steven Filppu, John T. Bannon, Jr., Marshall Tamor Golding and Frank O.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.