State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree burglary, ORS 164.215, and first-degree theft, ORS 164.055. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charges that led to those convictions, because the state did not commence the prosecution of the charges within the time limit established by the applicable statute of limitation. We agree with defendant and reverse.
The crimes for which defendant was convicted are felonies subject to a three-year statute of limitation. See ORS 131.125(6)(a); ORS 164.055(3); ORS 164.215(2). That means that the state…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. KayfesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. PurdomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MurrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. GRIERSONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018