Legal Opinion
Meo v. Bloomgarden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while plaintiff was riding in the truck of the defendant Bloomgarden who alone has appealed and to whom we shall hereinafter refer as the defendant. There was a collision with another automobile, and it is claimed that the defendant was negligent. The defendant, among other things, alleged in his answer that the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant at the time of the injury and that his only remedy is for the compensation prescribed in the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Much of the evidence was directed to this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Western Electric Co. v. BrennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bodie v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Johnson v. WeiseConnecticut Superior Court · 1938
- Rodgers v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997