Legal Opinion

In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 2011No. A10-2127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.*

The Minnesota Department of Human Services (MDHS) concluded that respondent Nobles County (Nobles) was financially responsible for social services provided to a child because it was the residence of the last parent with whom the child had lived. Respondent challenged that decision, and the district court concluded that appellant Brown County (Brown), the county in which the parent and the child last lived together, was financially responsible for the child’s social services. Because we see no error of law in the district court’s decision, we affirm.

FACTS

S.M. was born in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Cass County v. Wright CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API