Legal Opinion

President & Fellows of Harvard College v. Lee

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 29, 2014No. 2013-1628UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The President and Fellows of Harvard College and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (collectively, Harvard) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment affirming the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) finding that U.S. Patent No. 5,925,803 had expired as a result of a terminal disclaimer and refusal to enter new claims during the reexamination of the patent on that basis. Because the district court properly found that the PTO’s determination that the patent had expired was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or contrary to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. DRIT LP v. Glaxo Group LimitedSuperior Court of Delaware · 2023
  3. Jill Welytok v. Director of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  4. Schindler v. VidalDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API